ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.
Talk:InitialAmmo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Re: -2 |
Okay, I'm wrong. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{quote|Vinifera7|InitialAmmo{{Equal}}-2 results in the unit being created with an empty ammo supply.}} | {{quote|Vinifera7|InitialAmmo{{Equal}}-2 results in the unit being created with an empty ammo supply.}} | ||
:: Are you sure about that? I don't see any -2 comparisons in the code... (I didn't yet have time to dig into the chrono stuff, sorry.) ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 07:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)'' | :: Are you sure about that? I don't see any -2 comparisons in the code... (I didn't yet have time to dig into the chrono stuff, sorry.) ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 07:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)'' | ||
:::Okay, I'm wrong. I came to that conclusion a long time ago and I never double checked. In actuality, a negative integer ''other'' than −1, which is a special case, will result in the unit starting with that much ammo. If a unit starts with −2 ammo, it will have to automatically reload three times before having one usable ammo point. I will update the page later. Thanks for catching that. //[[User:Vinifera7|Vinifera7]] 19:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 20 December 2009
Vinifera7:
InitialAmmo=-2 results in the unit being created with an empty ammo supply.
- Are you sure about that? I don't see any -2 comparisons in the code... (I didn't yet have time to dig into the chrono stuff, sorry.) //DCoder 07:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm wrong. I came to that conclusion a long time ago and I never double checked. In actuality, a negative integer other than −1, which is a special case, will result in the unit starting with that much ammo. If a unit starts with −2 ammo, it will have to automatically reload three times before having one usable ammo point. I will update the page later. Thanks for catching that. //Vinifera7 19:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Are you sure about that? I don't see any -2 comparisons in the code... (I didn't yet have time to dig into the chrono stuff, sorry.) //DCoder 07:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)