Difference between revisions of "Talk:UseOwnName"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Template_talk:Flag|*cough*]] As I said there, the original flag info in this article too conveyed more information than is possible with the template.<br> | [[Template_talk:Flag|*cough*]] As I said there, the original flag info in this article too conveyed more information than is possible with the template.<br> | ||
[[User:Chpatrick|chpatrick]] 07:08, 31 May 2005 (CDT) | [[User:Chpatrick|chpatrick]] 07:08, 31 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | And what prevented you from expanding the template yourself? And, if there really was something: As you can see, the standard-template can still be used to include most information, rather than doing an all-new header. | ||
| + | Yet, I'll add Usable in: and Applicable to: in a minute, since at least the former is recurring information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just to make this clear: I have no problem with suggestions like that. I just don't understand how on one hand, you find the time to create a custom header and two talks how the current template is inadequate, but on the other hand can't be arsed to do the change yourself... | ||
| + | :[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 08:13, 31 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry Renegade, I created this article. Browser keeps logging me out... Sorry about not following header template - I didn't know there was one, nor how I would have gone about editing it! | ||
| + | :[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | See [[ModEnc:Templates]] ;)<br> | ||
| + | Yet, this still doesn't explain why chpatrick didn't just do it himself :P | ||
| + | :[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 00:14, 1 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:14, 1 June 2005
*cough* As I said there, the original flag info in this article too conveyed more information than is possible with the template.
chpatrick 07:08, 31 May 2005 (CDT)
And what prevented you from expanding the template yourself? And, if there really was something: As you can see, the standard-template can still be used to include most information, rather than doing an all-new header.
Yet, I'll add Usable in: and Applicable to: in a minute, since at least the former is recurring information.
Just to make this clear: I have no problem with suggestions like that. I just don't understand how on one hand, you find the time to create a custom header and two talks how the current template is inadequate, but on the other hand can't be arsed to do the change yourself...
- Renegade 08:13, 31 May 2005 (CDT)
Sorry Renegade, I created this article. Browser keeps logging me out... Sorry about not following header template - I didn't know there was one, nor how I would have gone about editing it!
See ModEnc:Templates ;)
Yet, this still doesn't explain why chpatrick didn't just do it himself :P
- Renegade 00:14, 1 Jun 2005 (CDT)
