ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:DCoder"

From ModEnc
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Not to mention, RA1 allied win does not logically relate with RA2. Else Dugan's claim "I was the one who put you in office!" wouldn't make much sense - US was not mentioned in RA1, so how would it have influence over the selection of the new USSR's puppet dictator?
 
Not to mention, RA1 allied win does not logically relate with RA2. Else Dugan's claim "I was the one who put you in office!" wouldn't make much sense - US was not mentioned in RA1, so how would it have influence over the selection of the new USSR's puppet dictator?
 
IMO, RA2 is a different, completely unrelated storyline. So is Generals.
 
IMO, RA2 is a different, completely unrelated storyline. So is Generals.
As I mentioned in the article, the PlanetCNC's Encyclopedia is a very detailed read regarding this subject.
+
As I mentioned in the article, the PlanetCNC's Encyclopedia is a very detailed read regarding this subject. -- [[User:DCoder|DCoder]]

Revision as of 17:16, 1 May 2005

Graph, uploaded ages ago. Crude, I know. chpatrick 09:53, 1 May 2005 (CDT)

I saw that. It's incomplete (only deals with RA2/YR and part of RA1), so it's technically not a "CnC timeline", but rather a "RA2/YR timeline". Not to mention, RA1 allied win does not logically relate with RA2. Else Dugan's claim "I was the one who put you in office!" wouldn't make much sense - US was not mentioned in RA1, so how would it have influence over the selection of the new USSR's puppet dictator? IMO, RA2 is a different, completely unrelated storyline. So is Generals. As I mentioned in the article, the PlanetCNC's Encyclopedia is a very detailed read regarding this subject. -- DCoder