Difference between revisions of "User talk:DCoder"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As far as I know, Westwood/EA specifically stated that RA2 is not part of the C&C timeline. | As far as I know, Westwood/EA specifically stated that RA2 is not part of the C&C timeline. | ||
:[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 12:45, 1 May 2005 (CDT) | :[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 12:45, 1 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Though does the RA2 setup not show the events of RA1 won by the allies followed by the events before RA2? | ||
| + | :[[User:Chpatrick|chpatrick]] 00:31, 2 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:31, 2 May 2005
Graph, uploaded ages ago. Crude, I know. chpatrick 09:53, 1 May 2005 (CDT)
I saw that. It's incomplete (only deals with RA2/YR and part of RA1), so it's technically not a "CnC timeline", but rather a "RA2/YR timeline". Not to mention, RA1 allied win does not logically relate with RA2. Else Dugan's claim "I was the one who put you in office!" wouldn't make much sense - US was not mentioned in RA1, so how would it have influence over the selection of the new USSR's puppet dictator? IMO, RA2 is a different, completely unrelated storyline. So is Generals. As I mentioned in the article, the PlanetCNC's Encyclopedia is a very detailed read regarding this subject. -- DCoder
As far as I know, Westwood/EA specifically stated that RA2 is not part of the C&C timeline.
- Renegade 12:45, 1 May 2005 (CDT)
Though does the RA2 setup not show the events of RA1 won by the allies followed by the events before RA2?
- chpatrick 00:31, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
