Talk:Infantry Linking

A few comments

Is it appropriate to credit authors of tutorials directly in the article text, as is the case with the "Tutorial on safe Usage by Marshall"? If that's the case, then it only seems appropriate for users to credit themselves for any unique information that they bring to ModEnc. I just can't think of any situation where this would be appropriate on wikipedia. If information is borrowed from a source (quoted, paraphrased, or summarized), a note should be included in a references section, which serves as a credit to the original author. Please correct me if I am way off base.

Next, what is the deal with links to nonexistent pages for units in unmodded YR? Would these pages be useful in any way? If so, standardized namespaces should be determined for them.

Vinifera7 04:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Attribution guidelines are in the Styleguide.

As for Unit:/Building: namespaces, we were planning on having pages for all those, but later it was decided that using Template:CNCRedirect and linking to the respective pages on CNC Wikia is easier. Guess those namespaces will be going to the bit. //DCoder 13:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)