ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.

Template talk:SourceCode: Difference between revisions

From ModEnc
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vinifera7 (talk | contribs)
Complaints
 
m Re:
 
Line 3: Line 3:


Second, the whole source code format seems like a blatant advertisement for your website. The source code can simply be linked in a non-biased way in an article's references section, as it was on [[ReloadIncrement]] before the revision. I see no reason to make a flashy box that says "Look at DCoder's website!".
Second, the whole source code format seems like a blatant advertisement for your website. The source code can simply be linked in a non-biased way in an article's references section, as it was on [[ReloadIncrement]] before the revision. I see no reason to make a flashy box that says "Look at DCoder's website!".
:I know "here" is not a very good solution, but I couldn't think of any better one. I'm not trying to advertise, my main point was to put these articles in a single category. If you think it would work better as a simple sentence or two instead of a full box, feel free to edit the template, as long as the category inclusion stays as it is. ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 04:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)''

Latest revision as of 04:15, 12 May 2008

Complaints

Using the word "here" for hypertext just doesn't cut it, especially in a wiki-like environment. The word "here" obfuscates the purpose of the link. If you aren't convinced, I can link articles that explain in great detail why this is not appropriate.

Second, the whole source code format seems like a blatant advertisement for your website. The source code can simply be linked in a non-biased way in an article's references section, as it was on ReloadIncrement before the revision. I see no reason to make a flashy box that says "Look at DCoder's website!".

I know "here" is not a very good solution, but I couldn't think of any better one. I'm not trying to advertise, my main point was to put these articles in a single category. If you think it would work better as a simple sentence or two instead of a full box, feel free to edit the template, as long as the category inclusion stays as it is. //DCoder 04:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)