ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.
Talk:FlightLevel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:Vinifera7|Vinifera7]] 22:32, 29 August 2006 (CEST) | [[User:Vinifera7|Vinifera7]] 22:32, 29 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
:I keep omitting it because, to my knowledge, no code from TS was castrated in FS (I mean, if your game is fully patched to 2.03, the engine used is completely the same regardless of whether you pick to play "TS" or "FS" in the startup menu) and thus all code flagged as "works in TS" works implicitly in FS. The only pages stating "works in FS" are flags introduced by FS, such as {{TTL|PrerequisiteGDIFactory}}. However, I'm now starting to think that might not be the best idea and a sign such as "2.03" would work better. <br>That is not the case in the RA2/YR transition (as it uses a separate exe as opposed to patching the original one), so YR deserves a separate mention. ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 06:49, 30 August 2006 (CEST)'' | :I keep omitting it because, to my knowledge, no code from TS was castrated in FS (I mean, if your game is fully patched to 2.03, the engine used is completely the same regardless of whether you pick to play "TS" or "FS" in the startup menu) and thus all code flagged as "works in TS" works implicitly in FS. The only pages stating "works in FS" are flags introduced by FS, such as {{TTL|PrerequisiteGDIFactory}}. However, I'm now starting to think that might not be the best idea and a sign such as "2.03" would work better. <br>That is not the case in the RA2/YR transition (as it uses a separate exe as opposed to patching the original one), so YR deserves a separate mention. ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 06:49, 30 August 2006 (CEST)'' | ||
I agree with '''V7''' fully.<br> | |||
FS is separate game.<br> | |||
So we need add it to all tags.<br> | |||
[[User:CnCVK|CnCVK]] 15:14, 30 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 13:14, 30 August 2006
What about Firestorm?
I've noticed that we haven't been putting FS in the Works in Game(s) slot. Why is that?
Vinifera7 22:32, 29 August 2006 (CEST)
- I keep omitting it because, to my knowledge, no code from TS was castrated in FS (I mean, if your game is fully patched to 2.03, the engine used is completely the same regardless of whether you pick to play "TS" or "FS" in the startup menu) and thus all code flagged as "works in TS" works implicitly in FS. The only pages stating "works in FS" are flags introduced by FS, such as Template:TTL. However, I'm now starting to think that might not be the best idea and a sign such as "2.03" would work better.
That is not the case in the RA2/YR transition (as it uses a separate exe as opposed to patching the original one), so YR deserves a separate mention. //DCoder 06:49, 30 August 2006 (CEST)
I agree with V7 fully.
FS is separate game.
So we need add it to all tags.
CnCVK 15:14, 30 August 2006 (CEST)