Trainable: Difference between revisions
People REALLY should've chkd the code for promoted units BEFORE typing anything here |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | |files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | ||
|values=boolean | |values=boolean | ||
|default=no | |default=yes for {{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}; no for {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | ||
|types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | |types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | ||
|ts=yes | |ts=yes | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | ||
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus because said objects | It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes' for {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, not 'no'. | ||
Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag. | |||
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.<br> | |||
<center><h3>Exceptions to <b>"Trainable=no"</b></h3></center><br>1.[[InfantryTypes]], [[VehicleTypes]] Get the result of the {{f|InitialVeteran|yes|link}} tag. | |||
2.[[InfantryTypes]] enters [[BuildingTypes]] that is using tags {{f|Armory|yes|link}} | |||
3.[[VehicleTypes]] gets the result of the tag. [[DeploysInto]] | |||
4.[[InfantryTypes]], [[VehicleTypes]] Promoted from introducing SPY into [[Factory]] of the enemy | |||
Latest revision as of 15:16, 19 September 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flag: | Trainable |
| File(s): | Rules(md).ini |
| Values: | boolean |
| Default: | yes for InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes, AircraftTypes; no for BuildingTypes |
| Applicable to: | InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes, AircraftTypes, BuildingTypes |
Specifies whether this object is subject to the Veterancy System and can thus be promoted.
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy crate bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have Trainable=no even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes' for VehicleTypes, not 'no'. Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.
Exceptions to "Trainable=no"
1.InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes Get the result of the InitialVeteran=yes tag.
2.InfantryTypes enters BuildingTypes that is using tags Armory=yes
3.VehicleTypes gets the result of the tag. DeploysInto
4.InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes Promoted from introducing SPY into Factory of the enemy